Reader: What the Boston Globe Did Not Say About Massachusetts Charters

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Reader: What the Boston Globe Did Not Say About Massachusetts Charters

  1. jeanhaverhill
    jeanhaverhill says:

    state backed policies have hindered many of the important programs and distorted others in education. In MA they use “euphemisms” for what they are doing like “innovation”. “Special” “investments” “empowerments”. and they usually all mean hedge fund programs that have “hybrid portfolios” that drain funds from the schools (like slum landlords drain from the cities). “The one thing that the Empowerment Zone has had going for it right along, of course, is a stratospheric level of support from Governor Baker and Secretary Peyser, and an unparallel amount of press coverage. While one assumes this will not garner local press coverage (as it isn’t public) unless carefully selected, meeting with carefully selected “leaders” is of course precisely how one goes about circumventing the democratic–and public–process.” (I borrowed this quote from a well known lady)

    The only thing that the “charter” schools have proven across the many states is “grandma’s rule”: TIME ON TASK — just like practicing more piano or more basketball will give you better skills to play the piano or play basketball. Yet, the politicians (and especially Devos and Trump but Governor Baker also) don’t want to pay for the after-school programs or the necessary essentials of the resources that would provide more time per child during the school day, (like librarians, or social workers, or nurses) and instead, they are stripping the resources out of the schools…. one writer called it “gold mining in your own back yard”…

Leave a Reply Cancel reply