I agree completely.
Here in Texas, we have decided that we should teach Chemistry to 10th graders, not AP just on grade level Chemistry. Most 10th graders are not developmentally ready to handle the abstract math and reasoning that is required to do the calculation.
https://davidrtayloreducation.wordpress.com/2015/03/06/inappropriate-sequencing-of-science-courses/
What if the education reform ideology is wrong? What if the ideology of reform was based on an incorrect understanding of developmentally appropriate pedagogy? In a 2006 hearing before the senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee, Assistant Secretary of Education, Henry Johnson testified, “We believe that the Advanced Placement program offers a proven, scalable approach to raising expectations and increasing rigor in America’s high schools, particularly those with high concentrations of low-income students that typically do not offer such curricula.” What if that belief is ill-founded?
I taught AP physics and what a treat that was for me. I always had the highest performing students in the high school. This year both the salutatorian and the valedictorian were in my class. It was way more interesting than teaching a concepts oriented class in physics designed for the general student. Of course, I enjoyed teaching AP Physics to the school’s…
View original post 1,910 more words